 | James H. MACCULLOH - 1852 - 542 pages
...fallacious and sophistical. " The case is not the same with our reasonings from the works ol nature. The Deity is known to us only by his productions, and is a single being in die universe, not comprehended under any species or genus from whose experienced attributes... | |
 | David Hume - 1854 - 576 pages
...fallacious and sophistical. The case is not the same with our reasonings from the works of nature. The Deity is known to us only by his productions, and is a single being in the universe, not comprehended under any species or genus, from whose experienced attributes... | |
 | John Stuart Blackie - 1871 - 432 pages
...whom we know by experience. But the case is not the same with our reasonings from the works of Nature. The Deity is known to us only by his productions, and is a single Being in the universe not comprehended under any species or genus, from whose experienced attributes... | |
 | John Hunt - 1873 - 494 pages
...its impression. 'The case is not the same with our CHAP. XIII. reasonings from the works of nature. The Deity is known to us only by His productions, and is a single Being in the universe, not comprehended under any species or genus, from whose experienced attributes... | |
 | William Jackson - 1874 - 436 pages
...foundation of any new inference. " The case is not the same with our reasonings from the works of nature. The Deity is known to us only by his productions, and is a single being in the universe, not comprehended under any species or genus, from whose experienced attributes... | |
 | David Hume - 1902 - 419 pages
...fallacious and sophistical. 113 The case is not the same with our reasonings from the works of nature. The Deity is known to us only by his productions, and is a single being in the universe, not comprehended under any species or genus, from whose experienced attributes... | |
 | David Hume - 1907 - 324 pages
...fallacious and; sophistical. /The case is not the same with our reasonings from the works of nature. The Deity is known to us only by his productions, and is a single being in the universe, not comprehended under any species or genus, from whose experienced attributes... | |
 | George Stern - 1971 - 172 pages
...anthropocentric. In the Enquiry, the emphasis in his rebuttal is on the uniqueness of the universe: The Deity is known to us only by his productions, and is a single being in the universe, not comprehended under any species or genus, from whose experienced attributes... | |
 | Peter Gay - 1995 - 596 pages
...coherence, according to the laws which nature has established for the government of such a creature." But "the Deity is known to us only by his productions, and is a single being in the universe, not comprehended under any species or genus, from whose experienced attributes... | |
 | David Hume - 1750 - 272 pages
...fallacious and fophiftical. THE Cafe is not the fame with our Reafonings from the Works of Nature. The Deity is known to us only by his Productions,...Being in the Univerfe, not comprehended under any Species or Genus, from whofe experienc'd Attributes or Qualities, we can by Analogy, infer any Attribute... | |
| |
The Deity is known to us only by his productions, and is a single being in the universe, not comprehended under any species or genus, from whose experienced attributes or qualities we can, by analogy, infer any attribute or quality in him. 
