The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and ReligionKnopf Doubleday Publishing Group, 13 mars 2012 - 384 pages NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER • The acclaimed social psychologist challenges conventional thinking about morality, politics, and religion in a way that speaks to conservatives and liberals alike—a “landmark contribution to humanity’s understanding of itself” (The New York Times Book Review). Drawing on his twenty-five years of groundbreaking research on moral psychology, Jonathan Haidt shows how moral judgments arise not from reason but from gut feelings. He shows why liberals, conservatives, and libertarians have such different intuitions about right and wrong, and he shows why each side is actually right about many of its central concerns. In this subtle yet accessible book, Haidt gives you the key to understanding the miracle of human cooperation, as well as the curse of our eternal divisions and conflicts. If you’re ready to trade in anger for understanding, read The Righteous Mind. |
Table des matières
Theres More to Morality than Harm and Fairness | 93 |
Morality Binds and Blinds | 187 |
Conclusion | 315 |
Notes | 323 |
| 377 | |
| 407 | |
Autres éditions - Tout afficher
The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion Jonathan Haidt Aucun aperçu disponible - 2013 |
The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion Jonathan Haidt Aucun aperçu disponible - 2013 |
Expressions et termes fréquents
ability actions adaptive American animals arguments asked Authority become began begin behavior believe better brain called chapter claim concerns conservatives cooperation create cultural Democrats described developed don't effect elephant emotions equality ethic evolution evolved example experience explain fairness feel figure five foundation genes give group selection groups happened harm hive human idea important individuals intuitions it's judgments kind less liberals live look Loyalty major mean minds modules moral nature original particularly party percent person play political principle psychology question reasoning religion religious response rider rules seems selection selfish sense shared social society sometimes story subjects theory things tion triggers trying turn understand United University values wrong