Parental Kidnaping [sic]: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Juvenile Justice of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-eighth Congress, First Session, to Examine Available and Proposed Means to Resolve the Cases of Interstate and International Parental Kidnaping [sic], May 25, 1983U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984 - 187 pages |
Autres éditions - Tout afficher
Expressions et termes fréquents
abducting parent Act is amended Alexandria application ARLEN SPECTER arrest Article assistance Attorney avoid prosecution award Central Authority Chairman child custody determination Circuit Court Civil Aspects Code complaints CONGRESS THE LIBRARY Convention court order custody decree custody dispute Department of Justice effect England English court extradition father Federal Parent Locator felony filed fingerprints foreign habitual residence HERGEN husband inserting in lieu interest International Child Abduction investigation issue Jay Howell Judge FOLEY Kidnaping Prevention Act LIBRARY OF CONGRESS lieu thereof LIPPE Lyons minor missing children months mother Oehl Office paragraph Parent Locator Service parental abduction Parental Kidnaping Prevention person police department problem proceedings removal or retention request SCHUTZMAN SCUTT Senator METZENBAUM Senator SPECTER Social Security Act Subcommittee subsection tion U.S. Attorney UCCJA UFAP Uniform Child Custody United United States Attorneys United States Code victim Virginia warrant wife
Fréquemment cités
Page 132 - State' means a State of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or a territory or possession of the United States.
Page 132 - It is in the best interest of the child that a court of this state assume jurisdiction because (i) the child and his parents, or the child and at least one contestant, have a significant connection with this state, and (ii) there is available in this state substantial evidence concerning the child's present or future care, protection, training, and personal relationships...
Page 88 - Hague, on the .... day of 19... in the English and French languages, both texts being equally authentic, in a single copy which shall be deposited in the archives of the Government of the...
Page 85 - ... there is a grave risk that his or her return would expose the child to physical or psychological harm or otherwise place the child in an intolerable situation.
Page 88 - State has two or more territorial units in which different systems of law are applicable in relation to the matters dealt with in this Convention, it may, at the time of signature, ratification, acceptance, approval or accession, declare that this Convention is to extend to all its territorial units or only to one or more of them, and may amend its declaration by submitting another declaration at any time.
Page 132 - State would have jurisdiction under subparagraph (A), (B), (C), or (E), or another State has declined to exercise jurisdiction on the ground that the State whose jurisdiction is in issue is the more appropriate forum to determine the custody of the child, and (ii) it is in the best interest of the child that such court assume jurisdiction ; or "(E) the court has continuing jurisdiction pursuant to subsection (d) of this section. "(d) The jurisdiction of a court of a State which has made a child custody...
Page 150 - Home state" means the state in which the child immediately preceding the time involved lived with his parents, a parent, or a person acting as parent, for at least six consecutive months, and in the case of a child less than six months old the state in which the child lived from birth with any of the persons mentioned. Periods of temporary absence of any of the named persons are counted as part of the six-month or other period; (6) "Initial decree...
Page 131 - Avoid jurisdictional competition and conflict with courts of other states in matters of child custody which have in the past resulted in the shifting of children from state to state with harmful effects on their well-being...
Page 84 - The removal or the retention of a child is to be considered wrongful where — (a) it is in breach of rights of custody attributed to a person, an institution or any other body, either jointly or alone, under the law of the State in which the child was habitually resident immediately before the removal or retention...
Page 88 - ... 3. Any Contracting State may at any time withdraw a reservation which it has made; the reservation shall cease to have effect on the first day of the third calendar month after notification of the withdrawal.