 The United States is not a party to any treaty, now in force, that prohibits or restricts the use in warfare of toxic or nontoxic gases, of smoke or incendiary materials, or of bacteriological warfare.  The Politics of Protest - Page 59de Jerome H. Skolnick, United States. National Commission on the Causes and Prevention of Violence - 1969 - 276 pagesAffichage du livre entier - À propos de ce livre
 | United States. Department of the Army - 1956 - 244 pages
...Provision. It is especially forbidden * * * to employ poison or poisoned weapons. (HR, art. 23, par. (a).) b. Discussion of Rule. The foregoing rule does not...bacteriological warfare. A treaty signed at Washington, 6 Febuary 1922, on behalf of the United States, the British Empire, France, Italy, and Japan (3 M alloy,... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Foreign Relations - 1969 - 64 pages
...weapons. It does not outlaw retaliation in case one is attacked. US POST-WORLD WAR II POLICY •me United States is not a party to any treaty now in...bacteriological warfare. A treaty signed at Washington «> February 1922 on behalf of the United States, the British Empire, France, Italy and Japan, contains... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations - 1969 - 1576 pages
...biological weapons. It does not outlaw retaliation in case one is attacked. US POST-WORLD AVAR II POLICY United States is not a party to any treaty now in force that prohibits or rf-tricts the use in warfare of toxic or non-toxic gases, of smoke or iuceniry materials or of bacteriological... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Foreign Affairs (1789-1975) - 1970 - 1398 pages
...GEORGE BUNN* The United States Army Field Manual on the Law of Land Warfare states flatly that the United States is not a party to any treaty, now in...restricts the use in warfare of toxic or nontoxic gases ... or of bacteriological warfare. . . . The Geneva Protocol for the prohibition in war of asphyxiating,... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations - 1972 - 460 pages
...no position on the state of customary international law and contents itself with a recital that the United States "is not a party to any treaty, now in...restricts the use in warfare of toxic or nontoxic gases. . . ." There is a split of opinion on whether customary international law also forbids the use of irritant... | |
 | Academie De Droit International De La Ha, Hague Academy of International Law - 1972 - 564 pages
...Land Warfare, US Department of the Army Field Manual FM 27-10 at 18-19 (1956) states in para. 38: "The United States is not a party to any treaty, now in...restricts the use in warfare of toxic or nontoxic gases ... or of bacteriological warfare . . . The Geneva Protocol ... is ... not binding on this country".... | |
 | Wil D. Verwey - 1977 - 404 pages
...chemical or biological agents is a matter of national policy."5 FM 27-10 adds in unequivocal terms: "The United States is not a party to any treaty, now in...restricts the use in warfare of toxic or nontoxic gases."6 On first sight this statement, whose unprecise terminology was derived from the Geneva Protocol... | |
 | 692 pages
...so, for me at least, the lights are out, and it is time to say "Good-night". OASES AND CHEMICALS The United States is not a party to any treaty, now in...restricts the use in warfare of toxic or nontoxic gases, or of smoke or incendiary materials, etc. A treaty signed at Washington, February 6, 1922, on behalf... | |
| |
